Profile

romey78
Strong NT x
5 card majors x
Weak 2s ✓
Transfers ✓
follow
Activity Following Followers Invite

Activity

Feb 15 2019 Progress +0.8
1 4 by EW -420 54.7%
2 3NT by EW 50 100%
3 4 by NS 450 98.4%
4 4 by NS 680 95.3%
romey78 wrote You are so right - thankyou !
romey78 wrote If you are playing weak 2s you have to open 2C!
5 3NT by NS 630 72.4%
6 5 by NS -50 39.2%
7 2 by NS -300 5.6%
8 5 by EW 50 82.2%
9 3 by NS 170 98.1%
10 3NT by NS 630 94.3%
 
Feb 14 2019 Progress +3.9
1 2 by EW 100 44.9%
romey78 wrote Isn't N hand too strong for a weak 2 ? 9 points and a void?
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
P
P
P

1
1♠
2
P

P
P
schnellfeuer wrote @romey78, I agree he is a tad too strong, but he could have bid 2S after easts 2D, he was strong enough for that. It is all about partnership understanding, hard to do with an AI.
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
P
P
P

1
1♠
2
P

P
P
2 1NT by EW 50 69.8%
3 1NT by NS -100 41.9%
4 6 by NS 1430 98.2%
5 2 by NS 90 64.7%
6 3NT by NS 430 62.5%
7 4 by EW 200 91.2%
8 4 by NS 480 98.4%
9 4 by EW -680 99.4%
10 4 by NS 650 99.9%
 
Feb 13 2019 Progress -2.6
1 4 by EW -420 56.2%
2 3 by NS 110 84.9%
3 2X by NS 470 99.4%
4 4 by NS 650 100%
5 3NT by EW -460 95.5%
6 2 by NS 110 55%
7 4 by NS 620 82.2%
8 3 by EW -170 38.4%
9 3 by NS -50 8.2%
10 1NT by EW 100 85.8%
 
Feb 12 2019 Progress +2
1 4 by NS 420 90.7%
2 2X by EW 300 99.3%
romey78 wrote 1NT- I thought that told P exactly what I had - a a stopper balanced 16 points - I would have liked 1 less D and 1 more spade-
romey78 wrote Sorry I didn't finish- to double but I doubled second time round since P hadn't bid but P passed the double for penalties!
3 1NT by NS -50 42.1%
4 4 by EW -650 97.4%
5 1NT by EW -210 70.3%
6 4 by EW -650 60.4%
7 3NT by EW -630 26.2%
8 1NT by NS 120 96.1%
9 3 by EW 300 100%
10 5 by NS 620 69.4%
romey78 wrote If you throw the K Spades on A clubs then A Spades doesn't make!
 
Feb 11 2019 Progress -5.4
1 2 by NS 90 64.4%
2 3 by NS -100 45.8%
romey78 wrote I tried to be too clever - thinking that in reply to the double I have to bid so 2C could be I have nothing so I jumped to 3C - only made 8!
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
1
P

P
X
P
3♣

P
P
P
romey78 wrote I tried a replay having thought I NT would be better in reply to the double but N went to game and I made a mess of it - did rebidding 1NT show more than 6-9 points and a heart stopper?
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
1
1N

P
3N
P
P

P
3 2 by NS 110 98.8%
4 5X by EW 200 99.1%
5 3 by NS 140 68.7%
6 4 by EW -680 27.9%
7 3NT by NS -100 26.8%
8 5 by NS 420 96.5%
9 3 by EW -170 98.1%
10 1NT by EW -120 51.6%
 
Feb 10 2019 Progress +1.2
1 2 by NS 110 88.6%
romey78 wrote S didn't have the points to bid at the 2 level but N seems to me quite reasonable opening with such a shapely hand !
romey78 wrote I thought opening a weak 2 should have 2 of 3 top honours- and N potentially is strong with that shape - a weak 2 would be just as misleading -
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
1
1N
2

P
2
P
P

P
graeme wrote Yes, it’s hard to know with that sort of hand. One thing we can rely on at Sky Bridge Club, though, and that’s that our friends, @romey78 and others, are always going to be in there making helpful, friendly comments. You folk are the best!
2 3NT by NS -100 54.7%
3 3NT by NS -100 51.8%
4 3NT by NS -300 30.5%
5 1NT by EW -90 99.7%
6 2 by NS 110 83.7%
7 3 by NS 170 93.9%
8 4 by EW -480 95.3%
9 1NT by EW -90 57.3%
10 4 by NS 620 88.2%