Profile

romey78

Strong NT x

5 card majors x

Weak 2s ✓

Transfers ✓

Activity

Feb 15 2019		Progress +0.8
1	4♠ by EW	-420	54.7%
2	3NT by EW	50	100%
3	4♠ by NS	450	98.4%
4	4♥ by NS	680	95.3%
	romey78 wrote You are so right - thankyou !
	romey78 wrote If you are playing weak 2s you have to open 2C!
5	3NT by NS	630	72.4%
6	5♣ by NS	-50	39.2%
7	2♥ by NS	-300	5.6%
8	5♦ by EW	50	82.2%
9	3♠ by NS	170	98.1%
10	3NT by NS	630	94.3%

Feb 14 2019		Progress +3.9
1	2♦ by EW	100	44.9%
	romey78 wrote Isn't N hand too strong for a weak 2 ? 9 points and a void? 4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers. W N E S - P P P 1♦ 1♠ 2♦ P P P
	schnellfeuer wrote @romey78, I agree he is a tad too strong, but he could have bid 2S after easts 2D, he was strong enough for that. It is all about partnership understanding, hard to do with an AI. 4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers. W N E S - P P P 1♦ 1♠ 2♦ P P P
2	1NT by EW	50	69.8%
3	1NT by NS	-100	41.9%
4	6♥ by NS	1430	98.2%
5	2♦ by NS	90	64.7%
6	3NT by NS	430	62.5%
7	4♠ by EW	200	91.2%
8	4♠ by NS	480	98.4%
9	4♠ by EW	-680	99.4%
10	4♥ by NS	650	99.9%

Feb 13 2019		Progress -2.6
1	4♥ by EW	-420	56.2%
2	3♦ by NS	110	84.9%
3	2♠X by NS	470	99.4%
4	4♠ by NS	650	100%
5	3NT by EW	-460	95.5%
6	2♠ by NS	110	55%
7	4♠ by NS	620	82.2%
8	3♥ by EW	-170	38.4%
9	3♣ by NS	-50	8.2%
10	1NT by EW	100	85.8%

Feb 12 2019		Progress +2
1	4♠ by NS	420	90.7%
2	2♣X by EW	300	99.3%
	romey78 wrote 1NT- I thought that told P exactly what I had - a a stopper balanced 16 points - I would have liked 1 less D and 1 more spade-
	romey78 wrote Sorry I didn't finish- to double but I doubled second time round since P hadn't bid but P passed the double for penalties!
3	1NT by NS	-50	42.1%
4	4♥ by EW	-650	97.4%
5	1NT by EW	-210	70.3%
6	4♠ by EW	-650	60.4%
7	3NT by EW	-630	26.2%
8	1NT by NS	120	96.1%
9	3♠ by EW	300	100%
10	5♦ by NS	620	69.4%
	romey78 wrote If you throw the K Spades on A clubs then A Spades doesn't make!

Feb 11 2019		Progress -5.4
1	2♣ by NS	90	64.4%
2	3♣ by NS	-100	45.8%
	romey78 wrote I tried to be too clever - thinking that in reply to the double I have to bid so 2C could be I have nothing so I jumped to 3C - only made 8! 4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers. W N E S - - 1♥ P P X P 3♣ P P P
	romey78 wrote I tried a replay having thought I NT would be better in reply to the double but N went to game and I made a mess of it - did rebidding 1NT show more than 6-9 points and a heart stopper? 4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers. W N E S - - 1♥ 1N P 3N P P P
3	2♠ by NS	110	98.8%
4	5♣X by EW	200	99.1%
5	3♠ by NS	140	68.7%
6	4♥ by EW	-680	27.9%
7	3NT by NS	-100	26.8%
8	5♣ by NS	420	96.5%
9	3♠ by EW	-170	98.1%
10	1NT by EW	-120	51.6%

Feb 10 2019		Progress +1.2
1	2♥ by NS	110	88.6%
	romey78 wrote S didn't have the points to bid at the 2 level but N seems to me quite reasonable opening with such a shapely hand !
	romey78 wrote I thought opening a weak 2 should have 2 of 3 top honours- and N potentially is strong with that shape - a weak 2 would be just as misleading - 4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers. W N E S - 1♥ 1N 2♦ P 2♥ P P P
	graeme wrote Yes, it’s hard to know with that sort of hand. One thing we can rely on at Sky Bridge Club, though, and that’s that our friends, @romey78 and others, are always going to be in there making helpful, friendly comments. You folk are the best!
2	3NT by NS	-100	54.7%
3	3NT by NS	-100	51.8%
4	3NT by NS	-300	30.5%
5	1NT by EW	-90	99.7%
6	2♠ by NS	110	83.7%
7	3♠ by NS	170	93.9%
8	4♠ by EW	-480	95.3%
9	1NT by EW	-90	57.3%
10	4♥ by NS	620	88.2%