Profile

hound
Strong NT ✓
5 card majors ✓
Weak 2s ✓
Transfers ✓
unfollow
Activity Following Followers Invite

Activity

Jun 16 2019 Progress -10.9
1 2 by EW -130 42.1%
2 3NT by NS 600 68.4%
3 1NT by EW 100 78.6%
4 2 by EW -130 7.5%
5 2 by EW -90 52.2%
6 3NT by NS -50 48.3%
7 2NT by NS -100 42.2%
8 4X by EW 100 99.3%
9 4 by NS 420 99.1%
 
Jun 15 2019 Progress +21.4
1 2 by NS 140 99%
2 6 by NS 1430 100%
hound wrote Normally a 4 response from partner should end the bidding and I thought long and hard before going for the Slam.
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
P
1

2
4
P
4N

P
5
P
6

P
P
P
hagleyjazz wrote @hound. Well done. With my bidding sequence I really should have looked for slam.
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
P
P

1N
X
2
2

3
4
P
P

P
crackerb wrote I let them play in 4d doubled and they went 4 down. It was fun to defend and a good result but it would have been more satisfying to have bid and made slam or even game in hearts. Well done @hound.
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
P
1

2
3N
4
P

P
X
P
P

P
3 4 by EW 100 98.5%
4 NB by - 0 94.1%
5 3 by NS 130 96.8%
6 3NT by EW -660 70.9%
7 3 by NS 130 97.8%
8 1NT by NS 90 92.2%
9 2 by NS 110 96.5%
10 1NT by EW -150 74.3%
hound wrote Lots of luck going my way tonight . I hope there is still some left for tomorrow against the Football Ferns
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
997maybe wrote Not just luck@hound...super playing!
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
1♠
P

1N
P
P
P
Debdaniels wrote @banksia9,@hound—— congrats — always a good day when you break 90 — unless your golfing!
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
1♠
P

1N
P
P
P
Graybill wrote Well done @banksia9 and @hound -
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
1♠
P

1N
P
P
P
 
Jun 14 2019 Progress +13.1
1 3NT by NS 400 91.9%
2 4 by EW -450 34%
3 4 by EW -650 84.3%
4 4 by EW -620 95%
5 3NT by NS 660 93%
6 2 by NS 150 96.2%
7 4 by EW -680 45.9%
8 1NT by EW -90 100%
9 1NT by NS 150 97.2%
10 1 by NS 90 99.2%
 
Jun 13 2019 Progress +7.1
1 2 by EW -170 27.2%
2 3NT by EW -430 98.3%
3 4 by NS -50 94.6%
4 6 by NS 1430 99.5%
5 4 by NS 680 95.2%
6 4 by NS -100 55.9%
7 4 by NS 620 93.7%
hound wrote @dizyauxy52emma Many of the players who got to a different contract were using Standard with an opening of 1NT (Strong) rather than Acol and weak NT. sometimes one works better than the other
hound wrote Just bad luck. North is a nice partner but is limited by computer code. Sometimes this is good and keeps us out of trouble. In this case all he knows is you have 12/19 points. takes an average looks sat his hand, can't give himself any value for the singleton in your suit and is instructed to pass if less than 6 points and game not on .
hound wrote Just bad luck. North is a nice partner but is limited by computer code. Sometimes this is good and keeps us out of trouble. In this case all he knows is you have 12/19 points. takes an average looks sat his hand, can't give himself any value for the singleton in your suit and is instructed to pass if less than 6 points and game not on .
hound wrote Just bad luck. North is a nice partner but is limited by computer code. Sometimes this is good and keeps us out of trouble. In this case all he knows is you have 12/19 points. takes an average looks sat his hand, can't give himself any value for the singleton in your suit and is instructed to pass if less than 6 points and game not on .
hound wrote Just bad luck. North is a nice partner but is limited by computer code. Sometimes this is good and keeps us out of trouble. In this case all he knows is you have 12/19 points. takes an average looks sat his hand, can't give himself any value for the singleton in your suit and is instructed to pass if less than 6 points and game not on .
8 4 by NS 420 52.5%
9 2NT by NS 150 92.9%
10 4 by NS -200 67.5%
 
Jun 12 2019 Progress -18.7
1 6 by NS -150 5.5%
2 3X by EW -630 1.7%
3 6NT by EW -1440 62.4%
4 4 by NS -200 70.9%
5 3NT by EW -400 66.5%
6 5X by EW 200 95.2%
7 6X by EW -1660 2%
hound wrote Interesting how the bidding varies. Some X some XX and then a few Easts decide to sock it to us with a cunning 6
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
-
P

1
3♠
4
4♠

X
P
P
XX

P
P
6
X

P
P
P
8 2 by NS -50 57.8%
9 3 by EW 100 97.1%
10 4 by EW -620 59.6%
 
Jun 11 2019 Progress -11.5
1 3 by NS -250 3.4%
2 2 by NS 140 88.8%
3 3 by EW -140 58.8%
4 3NT by EW -690 24.5%
5 5 by NS 620 94.5%
6 3 by EW -110 22.5%
7 2 by NS 110 71.4%
8 3NT by NS 460 68.6%
9 4 by NS 480 99.2%
 
Jun 10 2019 Progress -3
1 2 by NS 110 97.8%
hound wrote Although it doesn't help much after East shows the A one can be quite confident that all the high cards lie elsewhere. It did give me an extra trick in ♠ when I lead the 10 West didn't cover. Taking the finesse the other way was doomed.
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
P
P
1N

X
2♣
P
P

P
Chance22 wrote Thanks, @hound
2 4 by NS 680 99.7%
3 2X by EW 500 99.3%
4 2 by EW -110 28.6%
5 5 by NS 680 98.2%
6 3NT by NS -150 9.5%
7 4 by EW 100 99%
8 2 by NS -200 7.1%
9 3NT by EW 400 98.5%
10 4 by EW -620 38.4%