Profile

Newtz2001
Strong NT x
5 card majors x
Weak 2s ✓
Transfers ✓
follow
Activity Following Followers Invite

Activity

Feb 16 2019 Progress +9.5
1 2 by NS 90 87.9%
2 2 by NS 110 78.9%
3 3NT by NS 490 99.5%
4 3 by NS 150 38%
5 1 by EW -110 82.5%
6 3 by NS 170 67.5%
7 3NT by NS 630 100%
8 4 by NS 450 100%
9 3NT by EW -630 92.3%
10 2 by EW 100 96.2%
 
Feb 15 2019 Progress +2
1 4X by EW -590 7.1%
2 3NT by EW 50 100%
3 4 by NS 450 98.4%
4 6 by NS 1430 100%
5 3NT by NS 630 72.4%
6 5 by NS -50 39.2%
7 2 by NS -100 71.2%
8 5 by EW 50 82.2%
9 3 by NS 170 98.1%
10 3NT by NS 690 99.6%
 
Feb 14 2019 Progress -5.2
1 4 by NS 450 99.7%
Newtz2001 wrote @Wilma @humbleme two possibilities: he's playing conservatively and likes to have two of the top three honours for a pre-empt. I've also heard that some players won't pre-empt with a 4 card majors. So could be one of those or could be neither!
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
P
P
P

1
1♠
2
2N

P
4♠
P
P

P
Newtz2001 wrote Thanks it worked out well! Even if I'm never really sure if partner and I are on the same page with NT responses to overcalls!
2 1NT by EW -90 40.5%
3 1NT by NS -100 41.9%
4 6NT by NS 1440 98.8%
5 2X by EW 300 95.6%
6 3NT by NS 430 62.5%
7 4 by EW -650 9.5%
8 4 by NS 480 98.4%
9 4 by EW -680 99.4%
10 4 by NS 620 49.6%
Newtz2001 wrote You and me both!
TriciaCallow wrote You and @Newtz2001 and me all three! I thought I was being so clever.
 
Feb 13 2019 Progress -8.2
1 not completed
2 3NT by NS 600 100%
3 3 by NS -100 71.2%
4 3 by NS 200 50.6%
5 3NT by EW -460 95.5%
6 2 by NS 110 55%
7 6 by NS -100 59.8%
Newtz2001 wrote Very nearly made 6! The trump split was problematic though
4 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
-
1

P
1♠
2♣
2

3♣
6
P
P

P
8 3 by EW -140 74.2%
9 3NT by NS 400 57%
10 4 by NS -100 36.5%
 
Feb 12 2019 Progress -6.5
1 not completed
2 2 by EW 50 66.9%
3 1NT by NS 90 68.2%
4 4 by EW -650 97.4%
5 2 by NS -100 99.3%
6 4 by EW -650 60.4%
7 3NT by EW -630 26.2%
8 4 by NS -100 59.7%
 
Feb 11 2019 Progress -1.3
1 2 by NS 110 95.2%
2 1NT by NS 90 96.4%
3 2 by EW -170 23.9%
4 5X by EW 500 100%
5 3 by NS 140 68.7%
6 3 by NS -50 95.4%
7 2NT by NS 150 40.3%
8 6 by NS 920 100%
Newtz2001 wrote Oh dear! Couldn't get much worse could it!
9 4 by NS -100 99.6%
10 2 by NS -200 15.4%
 
Feb 10 2019 Progress +6.7
1 3NTX by EW 300 97.3%
2 2NT by NS 150 95.2%
3 3NT by NS -50 74.2%
4 3 by EW 200 69.4%
5 1NT by EW -180 17.1%
6 2 by NS 140 97.1%
7 3 by NS 170 93.9%
8 4 by EW -480 95.3%
9 2 by NS -50 75.6%
10 4 by NS 650 99.7%