Profile

Maur
Strong NT x
5 card majors ✓
Weak 2s ✓
Transfers ✓
follow
Activity Following Followers Invite

Activity

May 21 2019 Progress -0.6
1 3NT by EW -430 15.2%
2 3 by EW 50 96.4%
3 1NT by EW -150 7.9%
4 4 by NS 680 99.4%
5 4X by NS -200 45%
6 2NT by EW 300 97.6%
7 3NT by NS 600 98.9%
8 2NT by EW -150 62.5%
9 3NT by NS -50 32.5%
10 2 by EW 100 30.7%
11 6 by NS -100 6.2%
12 not completed
13 5 by NS -100 47.5%
14 4X by NS -800 5.3%
15 4 by NS 620 86%
16 4 by EW -650 71%
 
May 19 2019 Progress +1.7
1 3 by EW -150 47.7%
2 2 by NS 140 65.8%
3 6NT by NS 1020 99.2%
4 4 by NS 620 99%
5 6 by NS -200 3.9%
6 3 by EW 100 42.7%
7 3 by EW 100 83.7%
8 2 by NS -50 45.5%
Maur wrote @graeme I did exactly what Blomfield did and was told by a senior player opposition that the 1S bid shows 5 if there had been an overcall bid by the opposition- N 1C - W 1D - S 1S shows 5 ?. She said that the third call becomes as overcall therefore must have 5 . Be interested in you take on that please.
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

P
1N
P
2

P
2♠
P
P

P
 
May 18 2019 Progress -2.6
1 4 by EW 50 90.8%
2 6 by EW 100 83%
Maur wrote @graeme. Interesting hand. Just wondering if the results board could show what was led each hand as it is a good learning tool for us newbies.
5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Weak NT, Transfers.
W
N
E
S

-
-
P
P

1
P
2♣
P

3
P
6
P

P
P
3 NB by - 0 73.1%
4 not completed
5 3NT by NS -200 34.5%
6 4X by EW -1190 1.6%
 
May 16 2019 Progress -3.2
1 4 by EW 100 99.1%
2 2 by EW -170 99.8%
3 2NT by NS -50 44.4%
4 1NT by EW -90 54.2%
5 3 by EW 50 27.5%
6 3 by EW -170 19.4%
7 4 by EW 200 47.5%
8 not completed
 
May 15 2019 Progress +5.3
1 3 by NS 140 92%
2 3NT by EW -430 23.9%
3 4 by NS 420 89.1%
4 2NT by NS 150 46.4%
5 3 by NS -100 71.2%