Profile
Activity
| Jun 16 2019 | Progress +0 | |||
| 1 | 2♣ by EW | -110 | 71.8% | |
| 2 | 3NT by NS | 630 | 90% | |
| DexterMorrison wrote Hi@graeme. While I took N’s bid as you described, since N knows the point count of the two hands on the upside with certainty, could he have simply bid the contract at 3NT? 5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers. W N E S - - P 1N P 2♦ P 2♥ P 3♦ P 3N P P P | ||||
| 3 | 3♦ by EW | -110 | 33.9% | |
| 4 | 2♣ by EW | -110 | 12.1% | |
| 5 | 2♠ by NS | 140 | 100% | |
| DexterMorrison wrote Hi, @paddy1. Your bid sounds like a mis-bid. If you don’t know about the protocol, you might ask graeme about the “double-click”. Best 5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers. W N E S - 1♠ 2♣ X P 2♠ P P P | ||||
| 6 | 2NT by NS | 120 | 79.8% | |
| 7 | 2NT by NS | 120 | 81% | |
| 8 | 4♥ by EW | 100 | 99.4% | |
| DexterMorrison wrote Hi@graeme. If W’s bid was a transfer, could or should E not have accepted the transfer at the three level? Best 5 card majors, Weak 2 bids, Strong NT, Transfers. W N E S P P 1N P 2♦ 3♣ P P 4♥ P P P | ||||
| 9 | 3♦ by EW | -110 | 35% | |
| 10 | 3♥ by NS | 140 | 69.9% | |